1. |
Compare QAD side-by-side with BAAN, SAP, J.D. EDWARDS, EPICOR, ORACLE, and 80+ other ERP vendors
Nov 21, 2008
Today's usage of Decision Support Systems (DSS), combined with vetted ERP knowledge bases, allows organizations to save time and money, achieving better and more reliable/fully-documented decisions, a quantum improvement over the widely-used subjective process of selecting complex enterprise software...
|
2. |
ERP Evaluation Center
Nov 21, 2008
Today's usage of Decision Support Systems (DSS), combined with vetted ERP knowledge bases, allows organizations to save time and money, achieving better and more reliable/fully-documented decisions, a quantum improvement over the widely-used subjective process of selecting complex enterprise software...
|
| 3. |
ERP Showdown—Round 2! Exact Macola ES vs. Infor SyteLine vs. QAD MFG/PRO (1 Page)
by Dylan Persaud
Apr 11, 2007
Abstract : I'm Dylan Persaud, senior analyst at Technology Evaluation Centers. Due to the overwhelming response to our first ERP Showdown, we're pleased to present another head-to-head discrete enterprise resource planning (ERP) comparison. Here, then, is ERP Showdown, Round 2!—featuring Exact Macola ES vs. Infor SyteLine vs. QAD MFG/PRO.
|
| 4. |
QAD Explores E-Business While Not Abandoning ERP (4 Pages)
by P.J. Jakovljevic
May 22, 2000
Abstract : QAD, one of the leading ERP vendors, announced a number of product and alliance initiatives prior to or during Explore 2000, its annual user conference that took place in Nashville, TN from May 15 to May 17. We express our view regarding its latest announcements and strategic direction.
|
| 5. |
QAD Reports Third-Quarter--Revenue Rises 56 Percent (3 Pages)
by P.J. Jakovljevic
Dec 1, 1999
Abstract : On November 23, QAD Inc. reported that its total revenue for the third fiscal quarter ended October 31, 1999, rose 56 percent to $56.7 million, from $36.4 million in the same quarter last year. License revenue was $20.6 million, an increase of 21 percent compared with $17.1 million in the prior-year period. Excluding non-recurring tax charges totaling $1.3 million, QAD reported a net loss for the third fiscal quarter of $3.2 million, or $0.11 diluted loss per share. Including the $1.3 million of non-recurring tax charges, QAD's net loss for the third quarter was $4.5 million, or $0.15 diluted loss per share. This compares with last year's
|
| 6. |
QAD Inc.: The Art of Vertical Focus (6 Pages)
by P.J. Jakovljevic
Nov 1, 1999
Abstract : QAD is competitive in ease of global multi-site implementation and quality of global service and support. However, QAD's financial position has eroded significantly over the last 18 months, and organizations evaluating QAD products should exercise moderate caution and consider existing functionality only until the Company regains a consistent, profitable financial position.
|
| 7. |
QAD Pulling Through, Patiently But Passionately Part Five: Challenges (3 Pages)
by P.J. Jakovljevic
Sep 24, 2003
Abstract : QAD still has to create greater market recognition and additional revenue. QAD admits it has been struggling to offer complete 'across the board' functionality for larger companies, although the system supports multiple currencies and global tax management, and it is tailored to financial practices and requirements in major geographic markets, while the eB2 release features improved financial reporting and inter-company accounting.
|
| 8. |
QAD Pulling Through, Patiently But Passionately Part Four: Market Impact Continued (4 Pages)
by P.J. Jakovljevic
Sep 22, 2003
Abstract : QAD has long shifted its focus from being a mere ERP vendor dedicated to the industrial mid-market to fully leveraging the Internet in the applications it provides to manufacturers and distributors to link their back-office systems to those of their business partners via private trading exchanges.
|
| 9. |
QAD Pulling Through, Patiently But Passionately Part Two: Company Background (4 Pages)
by P.J. Jakovljevic
Sep 19, 2003
Abstract : QAD, a notable player in the upper middle of the discrete manufacturing market, embarked a few years ago on reinventing itself by delivering applications that would optimize complex order fulfillment processes across multiple enterprises and divisions. Another major product enhancement feat at the time was the QAD/Connects architecture, which was both an open architecture concept and a set of connectivity tools.
|
| 10. |
QAD’s Costly eTransition Continues (3 Pages)
by P.J. Jakovljevic
Jan 5, 2001
Abstract : QAD, one of the leading Tier 2 ERP vendors, continues its transition into a provider of e-business applications for manufacturing companies. However, the company’s financial performance continues to deteriorate: The company reported its third consecutive loss in Q3 2001.
|
